MARKET INTELLIGENCE

The Price–Performance Frontier of AI Inference

Which providers are actually efficient — and which are dominated.

Key findings
  • 3 of 13 providers are Pareto-dominant on score × output price under the General profile.
  • 77% of the market is dominated: a strictly better and cheaper alternative exists.
  • The frontier is workload-sensitive — providers enter and leave it when the profile shifts to Agents or Realtime.

The frontier

Ranking position and value position are different questions. The scatter below marks the undominated set: Nebius, DeepInfra, Nextbit. Everything else is inside the frontier.

78838894$0.31$0.62$0.92$1.23Output price $/M →Score ↑Nebius
Score vs output price · Pareto set highlighted · DEV DATA
What this means for engineers
  • If a provider is dominated under your workload profile, the burden of proof is on the other axes: residency, capabilities, support.
  • Price cuts move the frontier — watch the ticker's PRICE events; they reshape this chart within a day.
Dataset

Published figures are pinned to this snapshot and are not recalculated retrospectively. View the current benchmark →

Cite this researchInferenceBench (2026). The Price–Performance Frontier of AI Inference. InferenceBench Research.
← All research
Related research